← Back to blog

Veo 3.1 Lite vs Wan 3.0: Two Budget Video Models Compared

Veo 3.1 Lite is 54 credits per 8s with audio, Wan 3.0 is 24 at 480p and 95 at 1080p per 5s. Where each one belongs in a real budget.

Correction, 2026-10-01: this page said reference-to-video is available on base Wan 3.0 from 34 credits at 480p, without saying where. On the canvas, base Wan 3.0 takes text or one start image and no reference images; its reference-to-video mode is available only through the 8frame MCP connector and starts from a reference clip. On the canvas, Prime is the Wan that takes a reference clip. The table also marked Prime as having no audio, but Prime generates sound by default; and it marked base Wan 3.0 as silent, but base has no audio setting on 8frame, so we make no claim either way about its sound. And the FAQ named Wan 3.0 the cheapest video model on 8frame; Pruna p-video Draft, at 4 credits for 5 seconds, is cheaper. We also called Veo 3.1 Lite "the cheapest good video on the platform" and said both models handle straightforward movement well, neither of which we measured, and Veo Lite is not even the cheapest sound on 8frame: Creatify Boreal, at 7 credits for 5 seconds at 720p, is the cheapest with sound we can confirm.

Correction, 2026-09-30: we called Wan 3.0 Prime the premium tier and suggested it when base output is not good enough. Alibaba describes Prime as the high-speed version of Wan 3.0 with the same capabilities, so the difference you pay double for is speed (and, on 8frame, sound by default), not quality.

These two are the models to reach for when volume matters. Veo 3.1 Lite gives you 8 seconds with generated audio for 54 credits, about $0.54. Wan 3.0 gives you 5 seconds at 480p for 24 credits, about $0.24, scaling to 95 at 1080p. They are cheap in different ways and the difference decides which one belongs in your workflow.

TL;DR

The numbers

Canon 8frame prices, a credit is $0.01 at pack rate:

Model Clip Credits Audio Per second
Veo 3.1 Lite 8s at 720p 54 yes 6.75
Veo 3.1 Lite 8s silent 33 no 4.13
Veo 3.1 Lite 4s 27 yes 6.75
Wan 3.0 5s at 480p 24 no setting 4.80
Wan 3.0 5s at 720p 48 no setting 9.60
Wan 3.0 5s at 1080p 95 no setting 19.00
Wan 3.0 Prime at 480p 5s 46 yes, by default 9.20
Wan 3.0 base at 480p 30s 142 no setting 4.73

Read that carefully, because the headline "24 credits" is a 480p number. Comparing 480p Wan to 720p Veo Lite with audio is not a fair fight. At matched 720p and silent, Veo Lite is 4.13 credits per second and Wan is 9.60.

What each one is for

Veo 3.1 Lite is the volume option of the two. Audio included, 720p, Google's model family, and at 6.75 credits per second with sound it is the cheaper of these two models when you want sound in the same pass (Wan 3.0 Prime, the Wan that generates sound, is 9.2 per second at 480p). A 1,000-credit Starter plan buys about 18 clips of 8 seconds with audio. This is the model to draft on, to storyboard with, and to use for anything where you need many variations of the same idea.

Wan 3.0 base earns its place through two things Veo does not offer: duration up to 30 seconds in a single generation, and resolution as a dial you control. If you need one continuous 20-second shot, Wan is the option. At 480p it is also the cheapest way to check whether a composition works before spending real credits.

Wan 3.0 Prime, which Alibaba describes as the high-speed version with the same capabilities as base, is 46 / 95 / 189 credits per 5 seconds by resolution, about twice base. If you want 1080p, base at 95 is the cheaper route. On the canvas, Prime is also the Wan that takes a reference clip (reference-to-video); base Wan 3.0's own reference-to-video, from 34 credits at 480p, is available only through the 8frame MCP connector, also from a clip. The cheapest long single take on the platform is base at 480p: 142 credits for 30 seconds.

The trap in the Wan pricing

Wan 3.0 base defaults to 1080p, which is also the priciest tier. If you submit without setting resolution, you pay 95 credits for 5 seconds rather than 24. That default exists so nothing ever under-bills, but it means the model you chose because it was cheap will quietly cost four times what you expected. Set the resolution deliberately, every time.

The workflow that uses both

  1. Block the shot on Wan 3.0 at 480p, 24 credits. Is the composition right?
  2. Iterate on Veo 3.1 Lite silent, 33 credits per 8 seconds, until timing and motion hold
  3. For the final: Veo 3.1 Lite with audio at 54 if 8 seconds is enough, or base Wan 3.0 at 95 if you need 1080p, or 142 for a 30-second take at 480p

Total for a shot that lands: roughly 110 to 150 credits, about $1.10 to $1.50, depending on the finish.

What you give up going cheap

Resolution, first: Veo 3.1 Lite tops out at 720p, and Wan 3.0 reaches 1080p only at 95 credits for 5 seconds. Beyond that, we have not measured how either model handles motion, so test before you scale: run your hardest shot at 5 seconds on Wan 3.0 at 480p (24) and at 4 seconds on Veo 3.1 Lite from text (27 with sound, 17 silent) before you order a batch. The shots that commonly break on any model are hands, text in frame, and more than two people interacting. If your shot needs several retries on a cheap model, add the retries up before assuming it is the cheaper route.

FAQ

What is the cheapest AI video model on 8frame? Pruna p-video Draft, 4 credits for 5 seconds at 720p; the cheapest with sound we can confirm is Creatify Boreal, 7 credits for 5 seconds at 720p. Of the two models on this page, Wan 3.0 at 480p is the cheaper clip, 24 credits per 5 seconds; with audio included, Veo 3.1 Lite at 54 credits per 8 seconds.

Is Wan 3.0 open source? No. Wan 3.0 is API-only with no published weights, and neither is Wan 2.5. The last downloadable Wan is 2.2 under Apache 2.0. See is Wan 3.0 open source.

Can I get a 30-second clip in one generation? Yes, with Wan 3.0. On the base model it is 142 credits at 480p and 567 at 1080p; Prime at 1080p is 1,134.

Sources


Block cheap, iterate cheap, commit once. The 8frame canvas is free and unlimited; generation is paid from $19/month.

Written with AI assistance. Corrections are noted on the page. Editorial policy

Related articles

comparisonWan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5: Long Clips ComparedcomparisonIs Wan 3.0 Open Source? The 2026 AnswercomparisonMeta Muse Video vs Veo 3.1: What's Known, and What You Can Use Today

Make it
move.

Stay in the loop

Be the first to hear about our launch and get product updates