← Back to blog

The First Fully AI-Generated Commercials: Case File

A source-checked timeline of the commercials billed as AI milestones, from Adobe's Firefly ad to Toys R Us, Coca-Cola, Kalshi, and Svedka, plus what 'fully AI' actually means and an honest craft read.

Correction, 2026-10-02: we re-checked every case against the brand's, agency's or maker's own page or a major outlet that names who said it. We had stated several "firsts" in our own voice (Adobe's "first TV ad", Toys"R"Us as the "first" most people mean, Adobe's spot as "the moment" generative AI became the subject of primetime ads); they are now attributed to whoever made the claim. We listed Wild Card as a Coca-Cola studio for both years: it is reported only for 2024, and Coca-Cola names Secret Level and Silverside AI for 2025. The 37% positive-sentiment figure had no source; it comes from Sprout Social data reported by Campaign, now cited. Kalshi's cost, timeline and impressions are Kalshi's own figures given to Business Insider, now attributed as such. Svedka's "four months" is Sazerac's figure as reported via The Wall Street Journal; a ComfyUI customer story gives under one month of production, and both are now shown. We had said the robot and absurdist spots "survived" with audiences, which no source we found supports, and that our recommended workflow was "behind every milestone that actually worked", which we cannot show; both are rewritten.

Correction, 2026-09-30: we said Firefly produced elements of Adobe's 2023 spot and that it was the first time generative AI appeared on broadcast; the sources say only that it was an ad for Photoshop's Firefly-powered Generative Fill. We also dated Kalshi's production to two days (its maker said two to three), cited an untraceable view count, and said Coca-Cola was boycotted (it drew backlash). Fixed, with sources.

"Fully AI-generated commercial" is a phrase that almost never survives contact with the production notes. Every AI-made milestone spot below still had people on the script, the score, the edit, corrective visual effects, or a specialist studio spending months on character consistency. That does not make the claims fraudulent. It makes them a useful lens on what generative AI could and could not do at each moment. This is a source-checked timeline of the ads that moved the line, what each one actually automated, and an honest read on the craft. If you are trying to figure out where the technology really is, the gap between the "fully AI" headline and the credits is where the answer lives.

TL;DR

What "fully AI" actually means

A commercial has more parts than the footage. Script and concept, visuals, voiceover, music, sound design, editing, color, and finishing. A genuinely "fully AI" ad would generate all of them with no human in any seat. The makers' own descriptions are usually more careful than the headlines: Toys"R"Us said "almost entirely", Svedka said "primarily". Coca-Cola went furthest, calling its 2024 holiday film "the world's first entirely GenAI-created film on broadcast media", yet its 2025 release stresses human-led direction and music performed and sung by real artists. What ships is a spectrum:

Keeping this spectrum in mind is what stops you from either overclaiming or dismissing the technology. Every "first" below sits at a specific point on it.

The timeline

October 2023: Adobe's Firefly TV ad

Forbes reported that Adobe would premiere "the first-ever TV commercial powered by its Firefly generative AI" on Monday night, 2023-10-16, during MLB playoff and Monday Night Football broadcasts: a Photoshop spot showcasing the Firefly-powered Generative Fill feature, in which a girl creates her dream birthday invitation. iSpot lists the 60-second Photoshop spot, "Magic Garden", as published that day. It is an ad about an AI feature, not an AI-made ad: no source we found says Firefly generated the commercial itself. It is on this timeline as an early example of generative AI becoming the subject of primetime advertising.

June 2024: Toys"R"Us, the Sora brand film

Toys"R"Us Studios and the agency Native Foreign billed their film as "the first-ever brand film using OpenAI's new text-to-video tool, Sora". It tells the origin story of founder Charles Lazarus, with the mascot Geoffrey the Giraffe coming to him in a dream, and premiered at the 2024 Cannes Lions festival. The press release is precise about the credits: the film "was almost entirely created with Sora, with some corrective VFX and an original music score composed by Aaron Marsh" of the band Copeland. Native Foreign's chief creative officer told NBC News that about a dozen people worked on it, on and off over three months, around the same headcount as any other job. So this milestone was, precisely, AI visuals with human direction, human finishing and human music. NBC News reported immediate backlash online; one critic wrote that hiring actors would have made it "look a thousand times less uncanny". Our read: the weak spot showed in exactly the warm, human, nostalgic register the brand was reaching for.

Late 2024 and again 2025: Coca-Cola, the cautionary tale

Coca-Cola released AI-generated remakes of its 1995 "Holidays Are Coming" spot two years running. NBC News reported that the 2024 version was made by three AI studios, Secret Level, Silverside AI and Wild Card, using four different generative AI models; for 2025, Coca-Cola's own release names Secret Level and Silverside AI. Its head of generative AI, Pratik Thakar, described the 2024 film as "the world's first entirely GenAI-created film on broadcast media". Both rounds drew backlash: NBC News reported users calling the 2024 ad "soulless", and Campaign reported Sprout Social data showing that just 37% of social media sentiment about the 2025 ad was positive. Coca-Cola sees it differently: its global vice president for creative strategy told Marketing Dive the AI holiday ad "scored off the charts" with consumers and was "one of our top-tested ads in history". In our view, Coca-Cola is the clearest illustration that "can we generate it" and "should we generate it" are different questions, and that iconic, emotionally loaded brand moments are a risky place to visibly automate.

June 2025: Kalshi, the primetime cost case

The prediction-market platform Kalshi hired AI filmmaker PJ Accetturo to make, in his words, "the most unhinged NBA Finals commercial possible". The 30-second spot aired on 2025-06-11 during Game 3 of the NBA Finals (Business Insider), and The Verge headlined it a "fully AI-generated ad". Accetturo's own thread says he made it with Google's Veo 3: "This took about 300–400 generations to get 15 usable clips. One person, 2-3 days." He drafted the script with help from AI chatbots, had Gemini turn each shot into a Veo 3 prompt, and made the finishing touches in editing software. A Kalshi spokesperson told Business Insider the spot was generated entirely with Veo 3, went from idea to live ad in three days, cost roughly $2,000 to make and was on track for 20 million impressions; the spokesperson also said production companies had quoted "in the six or seven figure range". Those are Kalshi's own figures, not an audit. In our view, Kalshi is the case that mattered most economically, because it put a spot built from generated footage on national TV at a fraction of the quotes the company says it received. It also fits the register point below: chaotic, absurd characters, where an odd frame can read as part of the joke.

February 2026: Svedka, the Super Bowl claim

Svedka aired "Shake Your Bots Off", a 30-second spot in which its robot character Fembot and a new companion, Brobot, dance at a human party, and billed it as the first "primarily" AI-generated national Super Bowl spot (TechCrunch, Adweek). It was made with the AI studio Silverside. Svedka's parent company, Sazerac, told The Wall Street Journal it took roughly four months to reconstruct the Fembot and train the AI to mimic facial expressions and body movements (as reported by TechCrunch), and the brand noted that some parts, such as developing the storyline, were still handled by humans. A customer story published by ComfyUI, the software Silverside's workflows were built in, puts the production itself at under one month and quotes Svedka's Amy Remley: "We had just as many brains and hands touching this ad as any traditional production ad." Either way, the telling detail is the same: a broadcast spot with consistent characters took a specialist studio, trained models and a full team, not a prompt. See the full Super Bowl LX breakdown for the wider context of that night.

The honest craft read

Three conclusions from these cases.

The tooling caught up to the concept faster than to the credits. By 2026 generated footage can carry a 30-second national spot's visuals, as Kalshi and Svedka showed. What it did not do in any case here is remove people from the script, music, edit and finishing. The Toys"R"Us score and the Svedka build are not footnotes; they are where the remaining craft lives.

Register beats resolution. In these cases, whether an AI ad landed had less to do with the model or the resolution than with whether the subject suited the technology. Robots, absurdist characters and stylized chaos give an odd frame somewhere to hide; warm nostalgia and human faces at rest do not, and those are the spots that drew the backlash. If you are choosing what to generate, choose a register where synthetic texture is a feature, and test the warm, human version on real viewers before you ship it.

Character consistency is the real frontier. Sazerac's roughly four months to reconstruct the Fembot, and Coca-Cola's head of generative AI calling the "narrative continuity and character consistency" of its 2025 films the "most revolutionary" part, point at the same problem: keeping a face or figure identical across shots. That is why, in our view, character consistency and identity locking matter more for professional work than raw resolution.

What this means for brand teams

Do not chase the "fully AI" headline. It is a press label, not a production strategy, and it invites the kind of backlash Coca-Cola's AI holiday ads drew. Chase the parts of the spectrum that pay off: generate what suits the tooling, keep people on the score, the edit, and the finish, and pick a register that makes the synthetic texture intentional. The rights and disclosure picture matters here too, because "fully AI" claims draw attention to exactly the questions you would rather answer proactively.

The practical move is to build the spot on a canvas where you can generate across models, settle your character references early, and hand the clips to a human editor, in 8frame's Video Editor or your own editing software. That mirrors what the makers above describe: Accetturo generated in Veo 3 and cut in an editor; Silverside trained models on its characters before the spot was finished. Start on 8frame to run it, and see the best AI-made ads of 2026 for the campaigns that got the balance right.

Try it without signing up: the 8frame canvas opens on a real board. The canvas is free and unlimited; generation is paid from $19/month.

FAQ

What was the first fully AI-generated commercial? There is no clean first, and each "first" is a claim by the maker or the press. Forbes described Adobe's 2023 Photoshop spot as its first TV ad powered by Firefly (an ad about AI, not made by it). Toys"R"Us and Native Foreign called their 2024 film the "first-ever brand film" made with Sora. Coca-Cola's head of generative AI called its 2024 holiday film "the world's first entirely GenAI-created film on broadcast media". The Verge headlined Kalshi's 2025 NBA Finals spot a "fully AI-generated ad", and Svedka billed its 2026 Super Bowl spot as the first "primarily" AI-generated national one.

Was the Toys"R"Us ad made entirely with AI? No. Its makers said it was "almost entirely created with Sora, with some corrective VFX and an original music score composed by Aaron Marsh" of the band Copeland.

How much did Kalshi's AI commercial cost? A Kalshi spokesperson told Business Insider it cost roughly $2,000 and went from idea to live ad in three days. That is the company's own figure, not an independent audit.

Why did Coca-Cola's AI ads get criticised? Users online called the 2024 holiday ad "soulless" (NBC News), and Sprout Social data reported by Campaign put positive social sentiment about the 2025 ad at 37%. Coca-Cola's global vice president for creative strategy told Marketing Dive the AI holiday ad was "one of our top-tested ads in history".

Sources

All checked 2026-10-02.

Written with AI assistance. Corrections are noted on the page. Editorial policy

Related articles

trendDo You Have to Disclose AI-Generated Ads in 2026?trendVertical-First Video: Why 9:16 Is the Default in 2026trendWhat Happens to Your Sora Videos After Sept 24

Make it
move.

Stay in the loop

Be the first to hear about our launch and get product updates